Analytical Testing Services
Internal Vapor Analysis
High Resolution IVA
Hermeticity Testing
Krypton-85 Leak Testing
Material Outgassing Studies
Organic Mass Spectrometry
IVA™ Instrument Sales
Helium Leak Test
Instrument Sales
Construction Analysis
Destructive Physical Analysis
Micro FT-IR
Failure Analysis
Surface Analysis
Acoustic Microscopy
Real Time X-ray Inspection
X-ray Computed
Tomography (CT)
SEM Inspection
Ion Milling
Temperature Cycling
Environmental Testing
XRF Elemental Analysis
Counterfeit Device Screening
Areas of Expertise
New York Office (.pdf)
Colorado Office (.pdf)
French Office (.pdf)
Gas Analysis Form - New York
Gas Analysis Form - Colorado
Componet Analysis Form

8282 Halsey Road
Whitesboro, NY 13492
Phone: (315) 736-5480
Fax: (315) 736-9321

For further information,
please contact:
Deborah Delluomo
Phone: (315) 736-5480 ext. 2202

mail to:dadelluomo@ors-labs.com

mail to:dadelluomo@ors-labs.com

Hermeticity Testing

Hermetic seal testing is a crucial requirement for military, space, as well as commercial hermetically sealed devices. A lack of hermeticity is a reliability concern and may allow moisture and contaminants to enter the internal cavity, which could lead to premature failure. ORS performs seal testing per Mil-Std 883 method 1014 conditions A1 and B1 & B2, Mil-Std 750 method 1071 conditions H1 and G1 & G2, Mil-Std 202 Method 112 conditions C, D, A and E, and client specific requirements. Testing is also performed per Telcordia GR1221-CORE and GR-468-CORE for passive and active devices.

Leak Site Identification
Helium spray sniff testing is a technique that can be utilized to isolate hermetic leaks on open cavity packages as well as packages subjected to IVA testing. Devices are fixtured so as to draw a vacuum from the internal cavity into the leak detector through the open cavity or through a puncture site of the IVA test site. Typically, a helium spray creates a small envelope of helium in the proximity of a leak site region. The helium is drawn through the leak site and into the instrument giving an indication of the leak site location. Readings would be measured and recorded. This method works well with hermetic leak failures in the 10-4 to 10-8 atm cc/sec range.

Leak Site Identification is also available through the Kr85 hermeticity testing. Once a non hermetic package has been identified through Kr85 testing, a hand held gamma detector can be used to find radiation escaping through the leak site region. Readings are measured and recorded.

Fluorescent Dye Impregnation
Fluorescent dye impregnation is utilized to identify leak site regions and characterize the physical attributes of the ingress pathways to improve package sealing processes. This technique also eliminates the problem of misinterpretation when cross-sectioning fragile materials.

Helium or Krypton 85 Fine Leak
Devices are typically preconditioned in a pressurized chamber and, after the required conditions are met, the leak rate is measured and recorded, applying pass/fail criteria. Devices sealed with helium and undergoing helium leak testing need not be pressurized if requested.

Expanded Fine Leak for Other Gases and Compounds
Specialized leak testing is available for determining leak rates for gases other than helium. Leak rates of various gases (i.e. Argon, CO2, Acetic Acid, Ethylene Glycol, etc.) may be measured at low leak rates utilizing a specialized mass spectrometer tuned for the particular substance of interest. Applicable standards are normally available in a wide range of leak rates.

Helium Gross Leak
A device with a gross leak could theoretically pass the fine leak test. Therefore, this test is typically performed after fine leak. Depending on the requirement of the specification being followed, gross leak may be performed by two different methods.

1. The device is submerged in an indicator fluid tank at a specified high temperature of 125° C, and observed for evidence of bubble stream emanating from a gross leak site. A lower temperature may be used depending on device material constraints.

2. The test may require preconditioning in a pressurized chamber filled with an inert detector fluid that characteristically has a low boiling point. After preconditioning, the devices are submerged in an inert indicator fluid with a higher boiling point. In theory, any detector fluid located within the internal cavity of the package would boil when exposed to the high temperature of the indicator fluid, thus creating a bubble stream from the gross leak site.

Kr85 Gross Leak
A device with a gross leak could theoretically pass the fine leak test. Therefore, this test is typically performed prior to Fine Leak testing as a method of eliminating failures that would other wise trap large amounts of radioactive Kr85 through longer term Fine leak pressurization.

All rights Reserved, Copyright, Oneida Research Services, Inc.